Islam’s Golden Age: Misconception or Reality?
- Jeb Smith
- 9 October 2024
- 4 Comments
- 28 Min Read
ISLAM'S GOLDEN AGE
Hollywood’s Crusades: A Distorted Perspective
In 2005, I was interested in but lacked any deep understanding of the Crusades. I watched what I assumed to be a generally fair account of them, a movie titled Kingdom of Heaven. Having read many historians on the Crusades, I can confidently say this movie is referenced more than any other as a prime example of how Hollywood distorts our understanding of the actual events. The movie portrayed Muslims, especially Saladin, as enlightened, educated, tolerant and cultured, while with few exceptions, Crusaders were angry, hate-filled bigots against Islam and bloodthirsty barbarians lusting after power: the aggressors in the conflict.
But the action and battle scenes ignited my interest. I wanted more, and so I consumed whatever was readily available. I watched every documentary or movie I could find on The History Channel, National Geographic, and other similar sources. And I will never forget one documentary where they interviewed a PhD “scholar” who made the stunning claim that “Islam did not know about religious violence before the crusades.”
Reading published books and sources over the years and having spent a great deal of time researching Islam, the Qur’an, the hadiths and wider medieval history, I concluded that much of what had been portrayed about the Crusades and medieval Europe and the Islamic world on TV was false, purposely and demonstrably so.
The Myth of Islamic Pacifism
Modern Western societal religious superiority presents a peaceful Islamic world against a ruthless Christian medieval one. According to these sources, Islam was naturally very peaceful and did not know religious “hate” or war until being invaded by Christians, who in turn corrupted them to become more like the Christians themselves, hell-bent on conquest. This, in turn, explains why modern Muslims sometimes “act out” on behalf of their religion and commit religious acts of violence. The Crusaders taught them well.
The truth is, as a previous article demonstrated, the Islamic world was fine being the aggressor; they invaded, conquered, and exterminated various pagan tribes, religions, and sections of Jews and Christians as they expanded across the Mediterranean, into Europe, Asia Minor, the Holy Land, North Africa, and further into Asia. They enslaved, murdered, mistreated, raped, discriminated against, and forcibly converted the minorities under them. They persecuted, heavily taxed, tortured, killed, ambushed, and enslaved unarmed Christian pilgrims attempting to visit the Holy Land. But Islamic violence did not begin with Islamic interaction with Europeans; from its origins, Islam has known and put into practised religious warfare. Medieval Christians argued against Islam because it used force to spread their religion. We will briefly look at why this was so.
Muhammad’s Example of Conquest
Like Jesus is to Christians, Muhammad is the prime example of how to live for Muslims. And the Prophet of Islam had 700 Jews beheaded in Medina after forcing them to dig their graves. He stated in the Qur’an, “I was ordered to fight all men until they say there is no God but Allah,” and in a hadith “I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah.” His sword was nicknamed “the cleaver of vertebrae.” He led multiple raids on unarmed caravans and battles against non-believers. He sold Jewish women and children into slavery. He ordered entire populations killed. He had political enemies tortured, even a pregnant woman.
The Prophet’s love of war and battle against non-believers was evident. His dream was to die fighting in jihad, only to be reborn and die again in battle and continue to do so. Fighting, says Muhammad, is the best way to spread Islam. Further, he stated, “I swear by God…to fight for religion is better than the world and everything that is in it.” In Islam, the most excellent of all actions is to befriend anyone on God’s account and to be at enmity with whosoever is the enemy of God. Jihad is a struggle with nonbelievers; one aspect of that is military victory, and after faith in Allah, Jihad is the best work a Muslim can do.
The Qur’an’s Call to Battle
Allah, believed by Muslims to be the ultimate author of the Qur’an, was the name of one of the local pagan Arabian deities. But as the supreme god, he was tolerant of other religions. Islam maintained various local tribal pagan practices, such as kissing the Kaaba, a pagan shrine predating Muhammad. Likewise, Mecca, the holy city of Islam, where Christians, atheists, and Jews were and are not allowed to enter, was a centre of pre-Islamic pagan worship.
The Qur’an, the Muslim holy book, reinforces that believers are to be aggressive in war against the infidel. Sura 9:38-39 tells us that Muslims who refuse to fight for Islam will be punished. Fighting is non-negotiable. Time and again, it tells us that paradise is a reward offered for those who fight for Allah, and hell is the punishment for those who refuse. Muslims are to continue to fight nonbelievers until only Allah is worshipped on earth. That is why they were created, to help Allah in his wars. Islamic theology considers holy war and jihad as essential parts of the faith.
Islamic “Tolerance” in Question
Given a brief look at their prophet and some of their holy writings, it should not surprise us if certain Muslims were intolerant of other religions and that persecution occurred. Muslims believed that fighting for the faith and dying in battle was a guaranteed way to reach heaven. “Injustice” was not an inequity in the Islamic world, where God ordains all things, including death and suffering and sending people to hell. The 10th-century Arab Muslim poet Ahmad ibn Husein grumbled, “I perceive that men are naturally unjust to one another, but there is no doubt of the justice of Him Who created injustice.” If Allah himself created injustice, it must be just! This logic could lead to many atrocities.
When Muslims recaptured the Christian city of Edessa (igniting the call for the Second Crusade), they killed an estimated 30,000 men, women, children and clergy, and forced another 16,000 into slavery. After the capture of Antioch in 1268, Muslim ruler Baybars killed all the Christians in the massive city, barring the doors so none could escape. It was the largest massacre of the crusading period. Captured women were, writes scholar Thomas Asbridge, “repeatedly raped and then killed.” Time and again, Baybars swore safety to besieged Christian defenders so long as they stopped fighting, only to have them all killed after they were disarmed. After Antioch fell, he sent a letter to its Prince Bohemund VI (who was not in the city), bragging about the torture and slaughter of his people. For example, priests and monks were burned alive. The Christians in Antioch who refused to convert to Islam were stripped naked, tied in a circle, and burned to death.
Before being routed by the much smaller crusader army, overconfident Muslim chief Kerbogha laughed and said the Christians must all convert or die. The “people’s crusade” pilgrims were given the alternative of death or conversion to Islam, and most met their maker.
After defeating crusader warriors, Muslims often killed elderly people, breastfeeding women, children, monks and priests, but kept and enslaved the most attractive young women (nuns included) and the strongest men. They executed women, men, and the sick. When they captured Constantinople, they raped nuns and killed thousands, but kept the best-looking young boys and women as slaves, over 30,000 of them. Christians became such a large portion of the Muslim slaves that after the battle of Lepanto, 15,000 Christians were set free just from the Muslim ships captured. Muslims enslaved over a million white Christians in just one century!
Born in the 12th century, Albert of Aix, a historian of the First Crusade, wrote that the Turks defeated a group of Crusaders and went on to attack the defenceless pilgrims and “Going within the tents, they destroyed with the sword whomever they found, the weak, clerics, monks, old women, nursing children, persons of every age. But they led away young girls whose face and form were pleasing in their eyes and beardless youths of comely countenance.” After a Muslim victory in 1240 over a French Crusading army, Muslim chroniclers wrote: “…great numbers were slain, and the rest, loaded with chains, were led to Cairo…Upwards of one hundred thousand horsemen, infantry, tradespeople, and others were made slaves. The number of slaves was so great, it was embarrassing, and the sultan gave orders…to put them to death. Every night this cruel minister of the vengeance of his master had from three to four hundred of the prisoners brought from their places of confinement, and, after he had caused them to be beheaded, their bodies were thrown into the Nile; in this manner perished one hundred thousand of the French.”
Brutality in the Crusades and Beyond
The Islamic world was far from the modern, tolerant image it is often given. Leading crusades scholar Christopher Tyerman wrote, “One of the odder myths concerning the Middle Ages is of an intolerant Christendom corrupting a tolerant Islam.”
In addition to the atrocities and mistreatment of minorities mentioned in previous articles that led to the crusading movement, such as attacks on pilgrims travelling through their lands, further misdeeds were committed against those under their rule.
After taking over a territory, Muslims segregated themselves from pagans, Jews, and Christians, living separately. Through restrictive laws, Muslims maintained a segregated population, keeping Christians from copying or assimilating in their speech or dress. We condemn Christians for their attacks on Jews during Holy Week, but ignore that Muslims also engaged in those activities.
Under Muslim leadership, Christians faced significant restrictions on their religious practices. They were prohibited from building or repairing churches, had limitations on religious worship and public displays of Christianity, and were forced to assume a subservient role. For instance, they had to stand on the side of the road whenever a Muslim passed by, among other unequal laws.
They taxed those under them mercilessly. When Muslim rulers conquered new territories, the population generally did not convert to Islam until centuries later. A major driving force for conversion was to avoid additional taxes imposed on non-Muslims. Many converts to Islam were motivated by political power rather than intellectual considerations. Or financial, where it became too costly not to convert. In addition, Islam killed unbelievers and what it considered heretics.
Jews under Muslim rule in 12th-century Spain were forced to leave, convert, or die. Many left for northern Spain to live under Christian rule. Between 1032 and 1033, 6,000 Jews were massacred in Morocco and 915 in Granada. Fifty Christians were executed for blasphemy against Islam in Muslim-controlled Spain. Both Christians and Jews were forced to wear specific clothing and subjected to an extra tax for their faith. Crusaders helped free Jews from Muslim control in 1212 in Spain, and Christians helped defend Jews from Muslim invaders.
Women were not treated equally, and their lives were severely restricted, mainly being confined to the household. They were subservient to their husbands.
Saladin: The Heroic Myth vs. Reality
The Muslim Sultan Saladin was and remains more popular amongst Western Christians than in the Islamic world, but our ideas are based on a “vision far from the actual man and his exploits,” which is due to “misinformation and fantasy.” He is often presented as a tolerant, enlightened, generous ruler, as shown by his “peaceful” retaking of Jerusalem without a massacre compared to the slaughter committed during the First Crusade.
While not as bad as many of his fellow Muslim rulers, after the recapture of much of the Holy Land under Saladin, a large number of Christians were enslaved or executed. Further, Saladin desired to massacre the inhabitants of Jerusalem, but the Christian defenders threatened to kill the 5,000 Muslims they held prisoner, fight to the death, and destroy the Dome of the Rock and the Al-Aqsa Mosque. So, a deal was made that allowed many Christians to purchase their freedom. Still, the 16,000 (including children) who could not afford to buy their freedom were put into slavery, very often sexual slavery, after being sexually abused and passed around by the Muslim leaders. Men could purchase their freedom at 10 dinars and women at five, since in Islam, women are worth one-half of men.
But it shows how lopsided our understanding of the Crusades is when for Christians the bad exception, such as the Crusaders committing a massacre as they captured Jerusalem, (even though exaggerated) is presented as standard, while for Muslims the good exception, as in the case where Saladin, due to the deal with the garrison, allowed the garrison to go free or be enslaved if they could not buy their freedom, is presented as the norm. Professor Rodney Stark wrote, “Jerusalem was an exception to Saladin’s usual butchery of his enemies.” After Hattin, Saladin personally beheaded Reynald of Châtillon and commanded the killing of all Templars and Hospitallers. Why did he behead them? Beheading comes from the Qur’an, where Muslims are told to behead their enemies. Also, Allah sent angels to behead the enemies of Islam. Saladin also did things like massacring populations and poisoning the water Christians drank from by ordering dead bodies to be thrown into the wells.
Islam declares that any location once under Muslim rule remains so. They are to take back any lost land in jihad. Further, they are to expand until the whole world is under Muslim control. Saladin, sometimes presented as simply wishing to restore Islamic control of what was theirs, Jerusalem (ignoring that they initially conquered it from Christians, and the Sunni Muslim Turks recently took control from the Shiite Egyptian Muslims), stated, “It is our obligation to obey him [God] and to devote ourselves to the holy war.” He did not just want to retake the lands they once owned; after retaking Palestine, Saladin wished to “set sail…for their far-off lands and pursue Franks there to free the earth of anyone who does not believe in God.”
Saladin committed many atrocities, was not peaceful, and his military exploits were overrated. Even though he greatly outnumbered his opponents, he lost multiple battles and conducted numerous failed invasions of the Kingdom of Jerusalem before ever meeting Richard the Lionheart. His epic victory at Hattin was won because of the Crusaders’ lack of water, and Saladin lit the forest to choke them out; even here, the Crusaders almost turned the tide before ultimately failing. His strength lay in his diplomatic ability to unite the Muslim world and in strategic considerations rather than in field command.
In the end, 19th-century writers remade Saladin in their image: a 19th-century Gentleman with “English upper-class virtues.” But the image they loved is not the historical man.
The Golden Age of Islam: Reality or Myth?
Some authors present the medieval Islamic world as a golden age of achievement and feudal Europe as backward and barbaric. The Islamic world was peaceful, educated, enlightened, advanced, and culturally superior to the West. But is this so?
Professor Rodney Stark states, “Muslim technology lagged far behind that of the West.” Technology often went backwards when Islam took over. Almost all advancements in the Muslim world were derived from cultures they conquered rather than originating from within; according to Professor Stark, “to the extent that Arab elites acquired a sophisticated culture, they learned it from their subjected peoples…That is, the sophisticated culture so often attributed to Muslims (more often referred to as ‘Arabic’ culture) was actually the culture of the conquered people–the Judeo-Christian-Greek culture of Byzantium, the remarkable learning of heretical Christian groups such as the Copts and the Nestorians, extensive knowledge from Zoroastrian (Mazdean) Persia, and the great mathematical achievements of the Hindus.”
Professor Dario Fernández-Morera points out that the Greeks’ works were protected and translated in Europe and that Greek-speaking Christians in conquered Byzantine areas translated Greek manuscripts into Arabic, allowing Muslims to read them. He wrote, “It was Christian scholars who were responsible for bringing Greek knowledge to Islam, and this knowledge came to Islam only because Muslim forces had conquered areas (the Middle East and North Africa) where a rich Greek Christian civilisation had developed…Muslim ‘commentators’ of Aristotle…read him not in the original Greek but in translations made by Christians, from Greek to Syriac and then from Syriac to Arabic.”
In 948, Christian emperor Arminius sent Abd al-Rahman III, the Umayyad caliph of Córdoba, an original Greek manuscript as a gift; the Muslims had no one who could read it, so the emperor sent a monk who taught the slaves to read it for them.
Muslims burned Greek texts along with Bibles, Christian manuscripts and works, or anything deemed heretical. When Muslims conquered a people, they would keep under them the “best,” the most educated (and as we saw earlier, the best-looking for sex slaves, etc.), and they in turn would help Muslim rulers, working for them to stay alive. For example, Christians and Jews living under Muslim rule did most of the scholarship and translated key works into Arabic. Much of the architecture followed a Byzantine pattern, including the famous Dome of the Rock and the Great Mosque in Damascus. Naval advancements were made mainly by Italians. Science, astronomy, and medicine were advanced by Nestorian Christians and pagans who published their works in Aramaic, the dominant language of their society. They also translated the classics of Plato and Aristotle. Most of the libraries in the Islamic world were acquired from the conquered Byzantium and Nestorian Christians. The “heart” of the “House of Wisdom” in 9th-century Baghdad was a Nestorian Arab Christian, Hunain ibn Ishaq, who translated Greek works into Arabic. India and the Greeks influenced mathematics.
Unfortunately, some scholars have wrongly attributed many of these advances, actually the achievements of Christians and Jews under Muslim rule or derived from lands further to the East, to the Muslims themselves, due to their being published in Muslim countries and Arabic. Of course, Islam’s invaluable role as a conduit for knowledge from India and China and in preserving and disseminating much of the corpus of Classical learning should be fully acknowledged, as should achievements that genuinely did originate from Muslim scholars, such as the application of Hindu numerals to the representation of decimal fractions, a crucial advance that the Hindus themselves had never thought of.
But still, Islam gets a good deal too much credit. What led to the eventual “enlightened” Muslim Córdoba of Spain was that centuries later, the Muslim culture had partly assimilated into Spanish culture, and the Spanish converts had also assimilated and helped produce the Caliphate of Córdoba!
At the time, Muslims were seen as extraordinarily superstitious and backward, derived from the Qur’an and its pagan origins. Their treatment of women would appal modern sensibilities and certainly lacked the attitude of the Christian West. One historian writes, “About the position of women, the Qur’an could show nothing of the chivalry that was to develop in Christendom through the respect felt by Christians for the mother of Christ and for the many women martyrs and saints who suffered during the early persecutions.” When the Prophet was informed that the people of Persia had made the daughter of Chosroes their queen, he said “the tribe that constitutes a woman its ruler will not find redemption.” You won’t find women rulers in Islam like in medieval Europe, nor will women be respected and admired as they were in chivalrous Christian culture.
Great inequality existed in that the government and rulers dwelt in expensive palaces, benefiting from massive slave labour while leaving most of the population poor. Slave markets and the slave trade across the Islamic world began before and continued after the transatlantic trade, over time, trafficking more than ever came to America. While feudal Europe almost completely eradicated slavery, Muhammad insolubilized it saying, “God has ordained that your brothers should be your slaves.”
The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise
Was Muslim-controlled Spain the golden age of tolerance and enlightenment of the Medieval world, as some claim?
Professor Dario Fernández-Morera, who studied medieval Spain and wrote a book to “demystify” misconceptions about the purported Islamic Golden Age’s tolerance and love of diversity, says the modern population in general, in America much more than in Spain, receive a misleading perception of Islamic rule in Spain due to modern ideological and multicultural biases, along with Enlightenment historians who desired to portray a backwards “dark age” Catholic Europe.
Wherever they went, Muslims destroyed churches and religious buildings, enslaved, forced everything under the control of Islam, and eradicated the cultures they subjugated. Thus, Spain was conquered and colonised by Muslims who destroyed a more advanced, enlightened, and cultured society than their own. Before the Islamic conquest of various lands, including Spain, great learning, manuscripts, agriculture, and so on were produced by Greek and Coptic Christians as well as pagans native to the lands, but they were eradicated after the Islamic conquest. Islamic invaders were astonished at what they saw as they conquered Spain, its advancements, architecture, wealth, gems, buildings, books, libraries, statues, craftsmanship, artwork, etc. In their words, they “had never before contemplated such a degree of civilisation.”
Spanish Christians were unprepared for and not expecting such warlike people and the forcing of captive young women into sexual slavery; it was not what they were used to before coming into contact with Islamic armies.
Jihad: The Drive for Religious and Territorial Domination
When Muslim raiders first entered Spain during the 8th century, they brought back gorgeous women as sex slaves, and this, in part, fueled the desire for the Islamic armies to conquer Spain. However, the prime motivator was religion; Islam is to conquer the entire world until everything is under its rule.
To be a genuine Islamic ruler, one must wage jihad. Dario Fernández-Morera wrote, “Although the lust for booty and slaves was undoubtedly part of the Muslim armies’ motivation, the fundamental impulse for the movement of these armies through North Africa and then on to Europe was to carry out a religious war—jihad. Both Muslim and Christian sources referring to the invasion of North Africa and Spain, as well as archaeological evidence, attest to the importance of the religious factor in the Islamic conquest.”
The noted historian of Islam, Majid Khadduri, wrote “Islam, emerging in the seventh century as a conquering Power with world domination as its ultimate objective, refused to recognise legal systems other than its own. It was willing to enter into temporary peaceful relations with other states pending consummation of its world mission…In contrast with the modern law of nations…the law of Islam recognises no nation other than its own.” Professor Khadduri was writing about how this view has evolved over the centuries until today, but our concern here is with the attitude he describes that prevailed in Islam’s earlier days.
Jihad warriors were given plenty of incentives derived from their holy book and prophet. They could keep the property of anyone they killed in battle, they could keep captured women as sex slaves (in addition to four wives), or rape them, and if they died in battle, they were rewarded with eternal paradise, which also includes sex slaves. Indeed, this message came across to the soldiers when the Muslim commander Khalid ibn al-Walid told the Persians to submit; he declared that if they resisted, “You will face men who love their death as much as you love life.”
When Muslim forces conquered territories, they regularly exterminated any who dared resist and enslaved women and children, at one point burning alive Christians locked in a Church. Fear and intimidation were part of Islamic warfare to subdue non-Islamic cultures.
Islamic law allowed Muslim commanders and diplomats to lie to and deceive nonbelievers, and so they often violated treaties made if that benefited the expansion of Islam. After all, “Allah is also a deceiver and the greatest of them.”
Islam and Slavery: A Complex Legacy
Professor Wilfred Reilly referred to Arab Muslims as the “premier slave traders” of the world. Historian Dario Fernández-Morera wrote, “The massive trade in captured or bought black and white slaves was a cultural feature of Islamic Spain, as it was of the Muslim world in general…Islamic warriors pioneered the slavery of African blacks.”
Long before any white slave ship came to Africa (and after), Arab Muslims enslaved hundreds of thousands of Africans, especially desiring gorgeous women and children. Incidents of racially motivated crimes towards blacks also occurred. Spanish Muslim ruler An-Nasir “hanged the sons of the blacks from the well of his palace as a sort of counterweight to draw water, making them die.” Muhammad himself made many politically incorrect comments about blacks. Historian Dario Fernández-Morera wrote, “Although the Quran does not proclaim the superiority of any racial group, both Muslim Arabs and Muslim North African Berbers considered themselves different from and superior to blacks, whom they enslaved.”
Of all the sex slaves, blond girls were the most desired, selling for a much higher price. Many Muslim rulers had thousands of sex slaves, and they literally bred slaves for sex and trained them to be better sex slaves. Again, Fernández-Morera wrote, “Such was the cultural impact on the Islamic Middle Ages of Caucasian sexual slaves from Christian lands that the Turkish word kız, meaning ‘girl,’ ‘slave girl,’ and ‘sexual slave girl’ (or *concubine”) came to mean also ‘Christian woman’ in Islamic usage.”
Other slaves, often ethnically white, were bred and trained to be warriors, making up substantial portions of Islamic armies. During jihad, Muslims usually killed adult men, and so they raised the young boys as either sex slaves or soldiers for the next generation. Even though many of the Muslim rulers were white European in appearance, the children and further descendants of slave mothers, the massive amount of white Christian slaves impacted, to a large extent, the genetic makeup of Muslim peoples.
Unequal Status of Christians and Jews Under Islamic Rule
Muslim nations killed their heretics, freethinkers, nonbelievers, witches, blasphemers and gays, stoned adulteresses and apostates and conducted inquisitions. They forbade wine and other forms of alcohol; offenders were punished with 80 lashes, even if the smell was on their breath, let alone if they were drunk. No music or musical instruments were allowed. Unequal laws based on religion were maintained. Christians were not allowed to display or celebrate their religion in public. They could be crucified, tortured, impaled, beheaded or killed in various other inventive ways, for example, one nun was “thrown into a cauldron of molten lead.”
Christians received unequal status under Islam and were denied self-rule. Faced with death if they said anything hostile towards Islam or proclaimed Jesus in public, many Spanish Christians chose martyrdom by stating in public that Jesus is Lord or declaring Muhammad a false prophet and Islam a false religion. On multiple occasions, Muslim rulers expelled the entire Christian population from Spanish cities, sending them to Africa.
It can reasonably be concluded that moderns who love to extol the peaceful, tolerant, enlightened Islamic world of the medieval period would not like it very much if they could somehow be sent to live there.
FURTHER READING
This website uses affiliate links. If you purchase via these links, we might earn a commission that contributes to sustaining the HistoryMedieval.com platform.
RELATED POSTS
-
14 May 2026The Hospitallers on Rhodes: Masters of the Sea
-
23 Apr 2026The Hospitallers' Jerusalem: Faith, Care, and War
-
09 Apr 2026The Hospitallers: Defenders of Christianity’s Edge
-
11 Mar 2026The Teutonic Order: Crusaders of the Baltic
-
02 Mar 2026Knights Templar: Faith, Finance, and the Crusading World
-
12 Feb 2026Military Orders: Monks, War, and the Crusading World
SOURCES
Agobard of Lyons. (1981). On hail and thunder (W. J. Lewis, Trans.). In Agobardi Lugdunensis Opera Omnia (L. Van Acker, Ed.). Brepols. (Corpus Christianorum. Continuatio Mediaevalis, 52). Retrieved from Medieval Sourcebook, Fordham University.
Albert of Aix. (1921). In A. C. Krey (Ed.), The first crusade: The accounts of eyewitnesses and participants (pp. 48-52, 73-76). Princeton University Press. Retrieved from Medieval Sourcebook, Fordham University.
Andrea, A. J. (2020). The medieval record: Sources of medieval history (A. J. Andrea, Ed.). Hackett Publishing Company.
Anna Comnena (Komnene). (1928). The Alexiad (E. A. Dawes, Ed. & Trans.). Routledge, Kegan, Paul. Retrieved from Medieval Sourcebook, Fordham University.
Annalist of Nieder-Altaich. (n.d.). “The Great German Pilgrimage of 1064-65” (J. Brundage, Trans.). Retrieved from Medieval Sourcebook, Fordham University.
Anslem, Saint. (1893). “Gilbert Crispin: Disputation of a Jew with a Christian about the Christian Faith (Before 1096).” In J. Jacobs (Ed.), The Jews of Angevin England: Documents and records. London.
Armstrong, D. (n.d.). The medieval world. The Great Courses. Retrieved from https://www.thegreatcourses.com/courses/medieval-world.
Asbridge, T. (2005). The first crusade: A new history. Oxford University Press.
Barber, M. (2012). The Crusader states. Yale University Press.
Bede. (1910). Ecclesiastical history of the English nation. J.M. Dent; E.P. Dutton.
Bernard. (n.d.). “In praise of the new knighthood.” Retrieved from Hanover College History Department, https://history.hanover.edu/courses/excerpts/344bern2.html.
Blosser, J. (2016). Positively medieval: The surprising, dynamic, heroic church of the Middle Ages. Our Sunday Visitor.
Bull, M. (2005). Thinking medieval: An introduction to the study of the Middle Ages. Palgrave Macmillan.
Burman, E. (1992). The inquisition: The hammer of heresy. Dorset Press.
Catechism of the Catholic Church: Complete and Updated. (1995). Crown Publishing Group.
Chesterton, G. K., & Leo. (2012). The third way: Foundations of distributism as contained in the writings of Pope Blessed Leo XIII and Gilbert K. Chesterton (P. Boer, Ed.). CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform. Retrieved from https://www.historyisnowmagazine.com/.
“A Christian/Moslem debate of the 12th century.” (1989). Medieval Sourcebook, Fordham University.
“Confession of Arnaud Gélis, also called Botheler ‘The Drunkard’ of Mas-Saint-Antonin.” (n.d.). Retrieved from San Jose State University, https://www.sjsu.edu/people/nancy.stork/courses/c4/s1/Arnaud_Gelis.
Copan, P., & Flannagan, M. (2014). Did God really command genocide? Coming to terms with the justice of God. Baker Publishing Group.
Daniel, Abbot. (1895). The pilgrimage of the Russian Abbot Daniel in the Holy Land, 1106-1107 A.D. (C. W. Wilson, Ed. & Annot.). Fordham University.
Davis, M. W. (2021). The reactionary mind: Why conservative isn’t enough. Regnery Gateway.
Davis, W. S. (1922). Life on a mediaeval barony. Harper & Brothers Publishers.
Dawood, N. J. (Trans.). (2000). The Koran: With parallel Arabic text. Penguin Classics.
Daileader, P. (n.d.). High Middle Ages. The Great Courses. Retrieved from https://www.thegreatcourses.com/professors/philip-daileader.
Durant, W., & Durant, A. (1980). The age of faith (Vol. 4). Simon & Schuster.
Ekkehard of Aura. (1904). In J. H. Robinson (Ed.), Readings in European history (Vol. I, pp. 316-318). Ginn and co. Retrieved from Medieval Sourcebook, Fordham University.
Fernandez-Morera, D. (2016). The myth of the Andalusian paradise: Muslims, Christians, and Jews under Islamic rule in medieval Spain. Skyhorse Publishing.
Flick, A. C. (n.d.). The rise of the mediaeval church. Project Gutenberg.
Fulcher of Chartres. (1921). “Urban II’s Speech at Clermont.” In A. C. Krey (Ed.), The first crusade: The accounts of eyewitnesses and participants (pp. 280-81). Princeton University Press. Retrieved from Medieval Sourcebook, Fordham University.
Gautier, L. (2015). Chivalry: The everyday life of the medieval knight. Tumblar House.
Hoffmann, R. (2014). An environmental history of medieval Europe. Cambridge University Press.
Holmes, G. (Ed.). (1988). The Oxford illustrated history of medieval Europe. Oxford University Press.
Hoppe, H. H. (2001). Democracy: The God that failed: The economics and politics of monarchy, democracy, and natural order. Routledge.
Jarrett, B. (2007). Social theories of the Middle Ages, 1200-1500. Archivum Press.
Madden, T. F. (2005). The new concise history of the Crusades. Rowman & Littlefield.
Madden, T. F. (2011, March 19). “The real history of the Crusades.” Crisis Magazine. Retrieved from https://crisismagazine.com/opinion/the-real-history-of-the-crusades.
Makrisi, E. (1848). The road to knowledge of the return of kings, in chronicles of the Crusades. H.G. Bohn. (Reissued New York: AMS Press, 1969).
Marcus, J. (1938). The Jew in the medieval world: A sourcebook, 315-1791 (pp. 115-120). JPS.
Riley-Smith, J. (2014). The Crusades: A history. Bloomsbury Academic.
Schroeder, H. J. (Trans.). (1937). The disciplinary decrees of the ecumenical councils. B. Herder Book Co.
Tyerman, C. (2007). God’s war: A new history of the Crusades. Penguin UK.
LICENSE & COPYRIGHT
The copyright holder has published this content under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon this content non-commercially, as long as they credit the author and license their new creations under the identical terms. When republishing on the web a hyperlink back to the original content source URL must be included. Please note that content linked from this page may have different licensing terms.
If I have mistakenly misused any of your content, artwork, images, or videos, please contact me on historymedieval62@gmail.com and I will take the necessary corrective action.
This website uses affiliate links. If you purchase via these links, we might earn a commission that contributes to sustaining the HistoryMedieval.com platform.

Jeb Smith
Jeb Smith is an author, speaker, and historian who has written five books, including Missing Monarchy: Correcting Misconceptions About The Middle Ages, Medieval Kingship, Democracy, And Liberty (2025), and Defending the Middle Ages: Little Known Truths About the Crusades, Inquisitions, Medieval Women, and More (2026). Both were published with Sensus Fidelium Press.
Smith has written over 130 articles found in several publications and has been featured on various podcasts and in television and radio interviews. For speaking engagements, interviews, or questions, please get in touch with him at authorJebSmith.com.
Jeb Smith
Jeb Smith is an author, speaker, and historian who has written five books, including Missing Monarchy: Correcting Misconceptions About The Middle Ages, Medieval Kingship, Democracy, And Liberty (2025), and Defending the Middle Ages: Little Known Truths About the Crusades, Inquisitions, Medieval Women, and More (2026). Both were published with Sensus Fidelium Press.
Smith has written over 130 articles found in several publications and has been featured on various podcasts and in television and radio interviews. For speaking engagements, interviews, or questions, please get in touch with him at authorJebSmith.com.



















This is extremely well written.
History is written by the people who are in power at the time the history books are written.
The way that history has been written for many decades to denigrate Christianity and exalt every other religion and culture is a dead giveaway to the unsettling truth that the people currently in power despise Christians.
The winner writes the history!
This article offers a highly selective and polemical interpretation of medieval Islamic history, one that diverges significantly from the broader historiographical consensus. While violence and coercion undoubtedly featured within Islamic polities, such phenomena were NOT UNIQUE to them but characteristic of pre-modern societies more generally, including medieval Christendom. The absence of meaningful comparative context risks presenting a highly distorted account of the period.
The treatment of Islamic texts and the figure of Muhammad is similarly problematic. Quotations from the Qur’an and hadith are presented in isolation, without reference to their historical circumstances or the extensive exegetical traditions that have shaped their interpretation. Such decontextualisation is methodologically unsound and insufficient for drawing conclusions about religious doctrine or practice.
Moreover, the dismissal of the so-called Islamic Golden Age overlooks a substantial body of scholarship recognising the intellectual activity of the medieval Islamic world. While also partially indebted to earlier Greek, Persian, and Indian traditions, scholars operating within Islamic societies played a crucial role in preserving, transmitting, and developing knowledge across disciplines.
Overall, the article advances a reductive narrative that prioritises SELECTIVE EVIDENCE over balanced historical analysis.
congra!! “This is Google Gemini’s comment on the objectivity of your sources!”
Evaluating the Objectivity and Accuracy of these Sources for Writing about Islam and its Historical Rule
Assessing the objectivity and accuracy of these sources for writing about Islam and its historical rule requires a careful analysis of each source individually. However, we can offer some general observations:
Strengths of the Sources:
Primary Sources:
The presence of numerous primary sources, such as the writings of contemporary historians (e.g., Anna Comnena, Albert of Aix, Fulcher of Chartres), and documents from the period (e.g., “Confession of Arnaud Gélis”). These sources offer direct insights into the events.
The inclusion of sources from various perspectives (Christian, Jewish, and some Arabic sources like Makrisi). This allows for a multifaceted view.
Academic Sources:
The inclusion of works by contemporary historians specializing in the Middle Ages and the Crusades (e.g., Thomas Madden, Jonathan Riley-Smith, Christopher Tyerman). These sources rely on academic research and critical analysis.
Broad Range of Topics:
The sources cover a wide range of topics related to the Middle Ages, including the Crusades, daily life, ecclesiastical history, and interfaith relations.
Weaknesses of the Sources:
Religious Bias:
Many of the sources are from a Christian perspective, which can lead to bias against Islam. These sources should be treated with caution and compared with other sources.
Some sources, like “The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise” by David Fernandez-Morera, are controversial, and distinctly biased.
Lack of Islamic Sources:
Although some Arabic sources are present, there is a relative lack of contemporary Islamic sources. This can lead to an unbalanced view.
Translations and Interpretations:
Reliance on translations can lead to loss of accuracy or bias. Attention should be paid to the quality of translations and interpretations of sources.
Sources with Specific Viewpoints:
Some sources, such as the writings of Hans-Hermann Hoppe, or G.K. Chesterton and Leo, carry specific political and social viewpoints, and should be treated accordingly.
Recommendations for Use:
Use primary sources with caution and compare them with reliable secondary sources.
Rely on modern academic sources that employ critical research.
Seek out sources from various perspectives, including Islamic sources.
Be aware of religious and political bias in the sources.
Verify the accuracy of translations and interpretations of sources.
When writing about Islam and its rule, use sources that specialize in islamic history.
In general, these sources can be useful for writing about Islam and its historical rule, but they should be used with caution and critical analysis.