Mehmed II: From Boy Sultan to Conqueror of Constantinople
- Luciano Anastasi
- 11 September 2025
- 0 Comment
- 41 Min Read
MEHMED II: OTTOMAN EMPIRE BUILDER
Early Life and First Taste of Power
Sultan Mehmed II was born on March 30, 1432, in the bustling Ottoman capital of Edirne. As the son of Sultan Murad II, young Mehmed grew up in a world of palaces and politics. Ottoman tradition dictated that princes gain governing experience early, so at just eleven years old, Mehmed was sent to Amasya to serve as a provincial governor. There, under the guidance of scholarly tutors like Molla Gürani, he received a rigorous education in the Islamic sciences, history, and warfare. These lessons shaped Mehmed’s character, instilling in him both intellectual curiosity and a zealous conviction in his destiny. One of his spiritual mentors, Akşemseddin, reinforced the idea that it was Mehmed’s Islamic duty to conquer Constantinople, the Byzantine capital that Muslim armies had failed to capture for centuries. From boyhood, Mehmed carried the almost mythical goal of taking the great city that straddled two continents.
Mehmed’s first brief encounter with rulership came unusually early. In 1444, his father, Murad II, decided—perhaps wearily or strategically—to abdicate in favour of his son. At only 12 years old, Mehmed II was proclaimed sultan. This sudden elevation placed an inexperienced boy on the throne of an empire facing dangerous enemies. Almost immediately, a Crusader army led by Hungary’s warrior-regent John Hunyadi marched on Ottoman territory, seeking to exploit the power vacuum. The Ottomans’ enemies believed a child-sultan would be easy to overthrow. Mehmed, determined but realistic, recognised that this crisis demanded his veteran father’s expertise. According to Ottoman chronicles, the young ruler urgently wrote to Murad II, imploring him to return to lead the army. In a now-legendary letter, Mehmed made it clear that the empire needed its seasoned leader back on the battlefield:
“If you are the sultan, come and lead your armies. If I am the sultan, I hereby order you to come and lead my armies.”
Murad II complied with his son’s bold request. The elder sultan returned to command the Ottoman forces and faced the Crusaders that autumn at the Battle of Varna (1444). Mehmed rode beside his father as Ottoman troops met the enemy on the fields of Eastern Europe. The battle was fierce, but Murad’s leadership prevailed—the Crusader host was decisively defeated, and the threat to the young sultan’s reign was temporarily removed. The victory at Varna was a formative moment for Mehmed II. It showed him both the weight of the crown and the power of decisive action.
In the aftermath, Murad reassumed the throne for a time (in 1446) to stabilise the realm. Mehmed returned to princely duties, nominally still bearing the title of sultan but effectively learning statecraft from the sidelines. These teenage years were a humbling apprenticeship. Mehmed ruled only in name while his father handled affairs of state, and he observed the machinations of experienced grand viziers like Çandarlı Halil Pasha at the Ottoman court in Edirne. This period taught Mehmed patience and the importance of consolidating support among the empire’s elites. Murad II’s death in 1451 finally cleared the path for Mehmed to assume power in his own right. At 19 years old, he became sultan for the second time—older, wiser, and more resolute. The once-precocious boy ruler had matured into an ambitious young man hungry to leave his mark on history. Mehmed II’s mind was fixed on a single overarching prize that had eluded his ancestors: Constantinople.
MEHMED II: MILITARY CAMPAIGNS
The Fall of Constantinople (1453)
Constantinople, the ancient Byzantine capital, was the ultimate prize for Mehmed II – a city of immense symbolic and strategic importance. By the time Mehmed regained the throne, this once-majestic metropolis had been reduced to a beleaguered enclave surrounded by Ottoman lands. Yet it still tantalised as the “Red Apple” of Ottoman ambition. Immediately upon his accession in 1451, the 19-year-old sultan prepared in earnest for a final assault on the city that had defied Muslim armies for over 700 years. Mehmed understood that taking Constantinople would secure his legacy as a great conqueror in the eyes of both his contemporaries and posterity.
The young sultan’s preparations were meticulous and bold. First, Mehmed moved to dominate the Bosphorus Strait, the narrow waterway linking the Black Sea to the Sea of Marmara and Constantinople’s harbour. On the Asian side of the strait stood Anadoluhisarı, a fortress built decades earlier by an Ottoman predecessor. Mehmed set out to build an even larger stronghold on the European shore, directly across from the older fortress. Working at remarkable speed, his crews erected the massive Rumelihisarı (Fortress of Rumeli) in 1452, its thick walls and three tall towers looming over the strait’s narrowest point. This new castle, built within sight of Constantinople’s walls, gave Mehmed a stranglehold on sea traffic. By installing heavy cannon there, the sultan could levy tolls on any ships attempting to reach or leave the Byzantine capital. Famously, when a Venetian vessel tried to run the gauntlet without permission, Mehmed’s gunners shot it to splinters with a single enormous cannonball. The surviving sailors were fished out of the water and executed on Mehmed’s orders – a stark message that the Bosphorus was now under Ottoman control.
Over the winter of 1452–53, preparations intensified. In Edirne, Mehmed had hired a talented Hungarian cannon-founder named Orban, who cast for him one of the largest bombard cannons ever seen in Europe. This colossal gun, nicknamed “the Basilica,” could fire stone balls weighing hundreds of pounds – ideal for smashing medieval fortifications. Mehmed assembled an artillery train of dozens of cannons (unusual and cutting-edge weapons at that time), and he strengthened the Ottoman navy to blockade Constantinople from the sea. By the spring of 1453, an Ottoman army, perhaps 80,000 to 100,000 strong, marched to surround Constantinople, accompanied by elite Janissary infantry, cavalry from across the realm, and siege engineers. Across the Golden Horn inlet, a fleet of some 300 Ottoman ships – mostly transports and galleys – moved in to seal off the city’s harbour. Constantinople, led by the last Byzantine Emperor Constantine XI Palaiologos, was now alone, nearly encircled and outnumbered. Its formidable triple land walls were its final hope.
In early April 1453, the Siege of Constantinople began in earnest. Mehmed established his headquarters in a grand field tent before the Walls of Theodosius, and Ottoman cannons roared to life. The sultan’s artillery battered the ancient walls day after day, the thunder of cannon fire echoing across the Bosphorus. Massive stone cannonballs cracked masonry and shook the defenders’ resolve, but the Byzantines tenaciously repaired breaches each night. Mehmed’s forces attempted several frontal assaults only to be repelled by the desperate defenders. Frustrated by the stalemate on land, Mehmed conceived an audacious plan to bypass the infamous defensive chain that barred his navy from the Golden Horn harbour. On the night of April 22, in a remarkable feat of military engineering, the Ottomans hauled dozens of ships overland on greased wooden tracks, skirting around the Genoese colony of Galata and launching them into the calm waters of the Golden Horn – behind the enemy chain. Constantinople’s defenders awoke to find an Ottoman flotilla suddenly menacing the city’s once-secure northern sea walls. The Byzantines were forced to stretch their dwindling troops even thinner.
For weeks, the siege ground on, with mounting desperation on both sides. By late May, after nearly fifty-seven days under siege, Constantinople was exhausted. Food and supplies were nearly gone, and no relief army was coming. Sultan Mehmed sensed victory was at hand. In the pre-dawn hours of May 29, 1453, he ordered a final all-out assault. Waves of Ottoman troops surged against the walls. After fierce fighting, a detachment of Janissaries breached a section of the inner wall at the Gate of St. Romanus, where a cannon shot had opened a critical gap. The defence finally crumbled. Ottoman soldiers poured into the city as dawn broke, and Constantinople – capital of the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire for over a millennium – fell to Mehmed II. Emperor Constantine XI died in the fighting, reputedly throwing off his imperial regalia and charging into the fray to die anonymously alongside his soldiers.
When the dust settled, Sultan Mehmed II entered the conquered city in triumph. Yet what he found was a haunting scene of ruins and silence. Many of Constantinople’s grand churches and palaces had been damaged or abandoned after years of decline and the final onslaught. According to later accounts, Mehmed wandered through the great Palace of the Emperors – now an empty shell with birds nesting in its crumbling halls – and poignantly recited lines from the Persian poet Saadi:
“The spider is curtain-bearer in the palace of Chosroes;
The owl sounds the relief in the castle of Afrasiyab.”
These poetic words, uttered amid the ruins, capture Mehmed’s reflective mood. They speak of the transience of worldly glory: even the mighty palaces of legendary kings (Chosroes of Persia, Afrasiyab of Turan) had become homes only to spiders and owls. Mehmed II, at age 21, was now the master of Constantinople, but he understood on some level that he was walking through history’s graveyard – the fallen Byzantines had simply been the latest to succumb to time and conquest.
Mehmed moved swiftly to make the city his own. He famously rode to the Hagia Sophia, the great cathedral of Eastern Christendom, and ordered it converted into a royal mosque. He granted his soldiers three days to plunder – a customary reward in medieval warfare – but then quickly restored order to prevent the total destruction of his prize. Impressed by the city’s majesty and strategic position, Mehmed declared Constantinople the new capital of his Ottoman Empire (replacing Edirne). He took the title “Kayser-i Rûm” (Caesar of Rome), positioning himself as the legitimate heir of the Eastern Roman emperors by right of conquest. Though Western Europe’s Catholic powers refused to acknowledge any Ottoman claim to Roman legacy, Mehmed’s gesture had deep significance. He saw himself not just as sultan of a Turkish state, but as the rightful world-emperor in the Roman tradition. To reinforce this position, Mehmed sought the support of the Eastern Orthodox Church, which had survived the conquest. He appointed the scholar-monk Gennadius Scholarius as the new Patriarch of Constantinople, granting him authority over Orthodox Christians in Ottoman lands. In return, Patriarch Gennadius II recognised Mehmed II as the protector of Orthodoxy and successor to the Byzantine emperors in a civic sense. This savvy move helped pacify the city’s Greek population and gave Mehmed a veneer of legitimacy as more than a foreign conqueror.
The conquest of Constantinople sent shockwaves around the world. In Europe, church bells tolled in mourning – medieval Christendom regarded the city’s fall as a nearly apocalyptic event. In the Islamic world, by contrast, celebrations erupted. A oft-cited hadith (saying) attributed to Prophet Muhammad had prophesied that “Surely, Constantinople shall be conquered: what a wonderful leader will her conqueror be, and what a wonderful army will that army be!” Many Muslims saw Mehmed’s victory as the fulfilment of this prophecy, elevating the young sultan to near-legendary status as “Ghazi” (holy warrior) and “Fatih” (the Conqueror). Indeed, ever after, Mehmed II would be commonly known as Mehmed “the Conqueror” for this singular achievement. The city that the Ottomans called İstanbul was now the jewel of Mehmed’s realm. With Constantinople as his capital, Sultan Mehmed II had dramatically vaulted the Ottoman state from a regional power to an imperial one. But the Conqueror was far from finished – in his mind, Constantinople was just the beginning.
Conquests in the Balkans
With Constantinople secured, Mehmed II turned his attention to consolidating and expanding his empire, especially in the Balkans of Southeastern Europe. In the years immediately following 1453, the sultan launched a series of campaigns to bring remaining Christian kingdoms and lordships in the region under Ottoman dominion. These campaigns were a mix of calculated diplomacy and uncompromising force, as Mehmed pressed the advantage gained by his greatest victory.
Subjugating Serbia and the “Wall of Belgrade”
One of Mehmed’s first targets was the Serbian Despotate, a kingdom that had long been a tributary vassal to the Ottomans but still maintained a degree of autonomy. Serbia’s ruler, Đurađ Branković, had a complex relationship with the Ottomans – he was actually the father-in-law of Murad II and had paid tribute intermittently. By the mid-1450s, however, Branković leaned toward Hungary for support against growing Ottoman dominance, and he delayed payments of tribute. Mehmed saw an opportunity to press Serbian subordination by force. In 1454, Ottoman armies marched into Serbian lands. Mehmed’s forces captured a series of fortresses and towns on the frontier and even skirmished with a Serbian cavalry force, which they put to flight. They besieged Smederevo, the Serbian capital on the Danube River. Before Smederevo could fall, news came that John Hunyadi – the same Hungarian warlord who had opposed Mehmed before – was leading a relief army south. Mehmed prudently lifted the siege and withdrew that time, avoiding a pitched battle with Hunyadi’s larger Christian force.
The following year, after securing peace elsewhere, Mehmed returned to Serbia to finish the job. In 1455, he laid siege to Novo Brdo, a wealthy mining city in the Serbian interior (famed for its silver mines). The city’s defenders held out for about forty days, enduring relentless Ottoman cannon bombardment, before Novo Brdo surrendered. Mehmed then mopped up surrounding towns, effectively crippling Serbian resistance. Sultan Mehmed’s campaigns in Serbia were noted for their severity – by Ottoman accounts, tens of thousands of Serbian prisoners were taken, and many were resettled in Ottoman territories to prevent future rebellion.
In 1456, Mehmed II set his sights on a far more formidable obstacle: the fortress city of Belgrade. Belgrade (known then as Nándorfehérvár) was a bastion guarding the Hungarian frontier on the Danube, and it was the one major stronghold in the central Balkans that still blocked Ottoman expansion northward. Mehmed understood that capturing Belgrade would open the gates of Hungary and solidify Ottoman control in the region. He gathered a large army – contemporary rumours spoke of tens of thousands of troops – and personally led the campaign, bringing along a flotilla of river warships to assist from the Danube. Arriving at Belgrade in July 1456, the Ottomans commenced a heavy bombardment. Twenty-two enormous cannons pounded the walls day and night, gradually crumbling sections of the medieval fortifications. Mehmed’s troops filled the moat with rubble and prepared for a grand assault.
However, the Hungarian defender of Belgrade was none other than John Hunyadi – a seasoned general and national hero determined to save the fortress. Hunyadi, with a relief force and peasant crusaders inspired by a charismatic friar, managed to slip reinforcements into Belgrade and even sank much of the Ottoman river fleet in a dramatic nighttime sortie. On July 21, 1456, Mehmed ordered a massive attack, and furious close combat raged on the breached walls. Ottoman troops at one point broke into the city, leading to brutal street fighting. But the Christians, motivated by desperation, counterattacked fiercely. In the chaos, the Sultan himself joined the fray, displaying personal bravery. Mehmed II fought with sword in hand on the front lines, reportedly killing several enemy soldiers, until he was seriously wounded – struck by an enemy arrow or spear. The injury forced Mehmed out of the battle. Leaderless and battered, the Ottoman troops began to falter. Hunyadi’s men surged and pushed them back to the Ottoman camp. The wounded Mehmed, refusing to flee, helped rally his soldiers to prevent a complete rout, but the battle was lost. Belgrade had withstood the Ottoman onslaught. It was one of the few outright military defeats in Mehmed’s career and effectively halted Ottoman expansion into Hungary for decades.
Sultan Mehmed withdrew to Edirne to recuperate, frustrated by the failure at Belgrade. The fortress earned a heroic reputation in Europe as “the bulwark of Christendom,” while Mehmed licked his wounds. Interestingly, had Belgrade fallen in 1456, the Ottomans might have swiftly overrun much of Hungary. Instead, the stalemate held. Not long after, John Hunyadi died of an illness, and Serbia’s despot Đurađ Branković also passed away (late 1456), leaving Serbia leaderless and vulnerable. In the ensuing power vacuum, Mehmed saw his chance. In 1458–1459, after a brief internal struggle among Branković’s heirs, the Ottomans moved in to annexe Serbia outright. Mehmed’s grand vizier, Mahmud Pasha Angelović, led Ottoman forces that captured remaining Serbian strongholds, including the great fortress of Smederevo in June 1459. With that, the Serbian Despotate ceased to exist; its lands became Ottoman provinces. The fall of Serbia plugged a major gap in Mehmed’s European domains. By the end of the 1450s, nearly the entire central and southern Balkans—from the Aegean up to the Danube—lay under the rule of Mehmed “the Conqueror.”
Conflict with Vlad the Impaler
Even as he subjugated Serbia, Mehmed II faced a notorious foe in the Danubian principality of Wallachia (now southern Romania). This region, dense with forests and marshes, was ruled by the Voivode Vlad III, later infamous in legend as “Vlad the Impaler” (and the inspiration for the Dracula myth). Vlad III had a complicated history with the Ottomans. As a boy, he and his younger brother Radu were hostages at the Ottoman court, a common practice to ensure their father’s loyalty. There, Vlad learned Turkish and Ottoman customs – and also developed a fierce hatred for his captors. By the mid-1450s, Vlad III had seized the Wallachian throne and was technically an Ottoman vassal expected to pay annual tribute. But Vlad was independent-minded and brutal. In 1459, when Mehmed’s envoys arrived to collect the overdue tribute of 10,000 gold ducats and recruit young Wallachians for Ottoman service, Vlad III refused. According to one famous tale, he executed the Turkish diplomats by nailing their turbans to their skulls, declaring that “this is how we show respect” in Wallachia. It was a deliberate provocation and an open breach of fealty.
Mehmed II was furious. Still occupied with Serbia and other campaigns, the sultan initially dispatched a contingent of troops under one of his commanders to discipline Vlad. But Vlad III was a wily and ruthless opponent. In the winter of 1462, Vlad launched a shocking offensive: he led his own forces across the Danube into Ottoman territory, taking advantage of winter ice to move swiftly. Using stealth and intimate knowledge of Ottoman ways, Vlad’s men fell upon unsuspecting towns between Serbia and the Black Sea. They massacred thousands of Turkish villagers and soldiers, sparing no one. In a chilling letter to the King of Hungary, Vlad bragged that in a short span he had killed “23,884 Turks” (not counting those burned in their homes). The voivode’s preferred method of execution – impalement on wooden stakes – lent him his grisly nickname. Tales spread of Vlad III creating “forests” of impaled victims to terrorise his foes.
Faced with this brazen challenge, Mehmed II decided to personally lead a punitive campaign. In the spring of 1462, the sultan marched north with a force perhaps 90,000 strong, including his elite Janissaries and cavalry, determined to crush the Wallachian prince. Vlad could not face Mehmed in a pitched battle – his army was smaller and less equipped – so he turned to guerrilla tactics. As Mehmed’s columns advanced into Wallachia, Vlad’s men harassed them with sudden raids, disappearing into the woods. The voivode also implemented a scorched-earth policy, poisoning wells and burning villages to deny the Ottomans supplies. The peak of Vlad’s resistance came on the night of June 17, 1462, when he led a daring night attack on the Ottoman camp near Târgoviște. Disguising some of his soldiers in Turkish attire, Vlad infiltrated the camp after dark and launched a sudden assault, hoping to assassinate Mehmed II amid the confusion. Accounts say Vlad’s raiders came close to the sultan’s tent, sowing chaos, but they failed to find Mehmed himself. Dozens of Janissaries and Ottoman officers were slain in the melee before Vlad retreated into the forests. By dawn, hundreds lay dead, and the Ottoman camp was in disarray, though Mehmed II survived unscathed.
Despite Vlad’s terrifying tactics, the numerical superiority of the Ottoman army began to tell. Mehmed advanced to capture the Wallachian capital of Târgoviște – only to be greeted by a ghastly sight outside the city: a field of impaled corpses, the remains of Turkish prisoners arranged by Vlad as a psychological weapon. The macabre display did give Mehmed pause, but it did not halt his campaign. Wallachia simply proved too hostile and wild to conquer outright, and Mehmed’s goal shifted from killing Vlad to replacing him. The Sultan had a convenient alternative ready: Vlad’s own brother, Radu the Fair, had been raised in the Ottoman court and was friendly to Mehmed. As the Ottoman army pressed on, many local boyar nobles, weary of Vlad’s harsh rule, defected to the Ottomans and accepted Radu as the new prince. Vlad III was forced to flee northward; by the autumn of 1462, he had sought refuge in Hungary (where he was ironically imprisoned for a time).
Mehmed II installed Radu as a client ruler in Wallachia, thus achieving a political victory without the burden of occupying a resistant land. The conflict with Vlad the Impaler would live on in legend and literature, but for Mehmed, it was just another rebellious vassal tamed. Wallachia remained under intermittent Ottoman influence, and Vlad III would only briefly regain power years later (before meeting a violent end). The sultan had demonstrated both resolve and pragmatism: he neutralised a dangerous foe and reminded other vassal states of the grim fate awaiting those who defied “the Conqueror.”
Bosnia and the End of a Kingdom
By the early 1460s, Mehmed II had eliminated or vassalized most of the independent powers in the Balkans with two conspicuous exceptions: the Kingdom of Bosnia and the mountainous stronghold of Albania (more on Albania shortly). The Kingdom of Bosnia, located to the west of Serbia, had thus far avoided direct conquest by maintaining a tributary relationship with the Ottomans. However, its young king Stephen Tomašević (crowned 1461) made a fatal miscalculation. Feeling insecure on his throne and hoping for Western assistance, Stephen stopped paying the yearly tribute to Mehmed and appealed to the Pope and Hungary for help. This open defiance gave Mehmed his casus belli.
In the spring of 1463, Sultan Mehmed II swept into Bosnia at the head of a well-organised force. The campaign was swift and decisive. The Ottomans first seized the important fortress of Bobovac, the royal seat where Bosnia’s crown jewels were kept – its quick capitulation shocked the Bosnians. King Stephen fled from one fort to another, desperately seeking refuge. Mehmed’s army pressed onward, taking Jajce and then Ključ, where Stephen Tomašević was eventually captured. The 25-year-old king was brought before Mehmed II, who initially assured him of mercy. But perhaps due to broken oaths or the sultan’s own resolve to make an example, Stephen was executed, reportedly beheaded on Mehmed’s orders. With his death, the independent Kingdom of Bosnia was extinguished. Many of its nobility either fled or were also killed, while some converted to Islam and were co-opted into the Ottoman system.
Mehmed annexed Bosnia, making it the westernmost Ottoman province in Southeastern Europe. The fall of Bosnia in 1463 deeply alarmed the nearby Kingdom of Hungary and the Republic of Venice, which suddenly shared a border with the expanding Ottoman realm. Indeed, these powers would soon try to counter Mehmed’s gains, leading to one of the longest wars of his reign. But for the moment, Mehmed II had achieved an extraordinary transformation of the Balkan political landscape. In little over a decade, he had wiped away the last vestiges of Byzantine rule and absorbed Serbia, the Morea, and Bosnia. Only a few pockets of resistance remained in the Balkans – most notably in Albania and in some coastal cities under Venetian control. The Conqueror’s appetite for expansion was hardly sated, and conflict with the remaining Christian powers in the region was inevitable.
War with Venice and the Last Crusaders
Mehmed II’s rapid conquests in the 1450s and early 1460s did not go unnoticed by the maritime Republic of Venice, a major power in the Mediterranean with colonies and trading interests all around the Aegean and Adriatic seas. Tensions between the Ottomans and Venice had been on the rise – traders quarrelled, borders rubbed, and each side harboured distrust of the other’s intentions. When Bosnia fell in 1463 and the Ottoman frontier reached the Adriatic, Venice grew alarmed. That same year, Pope Pius II succeeded (for the last time in history) in proclaiming a new crusade against the Ottomans. Although the Pope’s own crusading fleet never materialised (he died shortly after), Venice and the Kingdom of Hungary took up arms. Thus began the Ottoman–Venetian War of 1463–1479, a long and costly struggle that would test Mehmed’s empire.
The opening moves favoured the Christian allies. In late 1463, a Venetian army landed in Greece and, with local Greek support, managed to retake the strategic Peloponnesian fortress of Argos. They also rebuilt the Hexamilion wall across the Isthmus of Corinth, briefly blocking Ottoman access to the Morea (southern Greece). Meanwhile, the Hungarian king Matthias Corvinus seized some fortresses in Bosnia, including the old Bosnian capital of Jajce, denying them to the Ottomans. Mehmed II moved quickly to respond on multiple fronts. He dispatched his capable Grand Vizier, Mahmud Pasha, to Greece. In 1464, Mahmud Pasha’s forces burst into the Peloponnese, shattered the Hexamilion (the wall was smashed apart for the second time in 20 years), and forced the Venetians into retreat. Argos and other towns that had briefly welcomed Venetian rule were brought back under the Ottoman fold. Mehmed himself marched into Bosnia to counter Matthias Corvinus. The sultan’s attempt to recapture Jajce in 1464 failed after a tough siege – the fortress held out, and Corvinus’s approaching army forced an Ottoman withdrawal. For the time being, the Kingdom of Hungary managed to create a buffer in northern Bosnia.
The war ground on indecisively. Venice, for all its naval strength, struggled to defend its far-flung Greek possessions. The Venetians launched raids and seized Aegean islands when they could, while the Ottomans gradually tightened their grip on remaining Byzantine holdouts. One by one, even the last independent Greek regions fell: in 1460, Mehmed had completed the conquest of the Morea by taking Mistra, and in 1461, he had compelled the surrender of the distant Empire of Trebizond on the Black Sea coast (bringing an end to the final Byzantine splinter state). Venetian-controlled islands like Lesbos (Mytilene) were attacked – in 1462, Mehmed’s fleet captured Lesbos from its Genoese lords (allied to the Venetians). Venice attempted counterstrikes, but with mixed success. A turning point came in 1470, when Mehmed II personally led a massive combined land-sea operation to capture Negroponte (Euboea), the largest island in the Aegean still in Venetian hands. After a brutal siege of the fortress of Chalkis, the Ottomans overran Negroponte, shocking Venice with the loss of one of its richest eastern colonies.
Throughout these campaigns, Mehmed displayed not only military might but also strategic tenacity. The war saw episodes of high drama – for example, the famed Albanian resistance leader Skanderbeg, who had fought the Ottomans for decades, allied with the Venetians. Mehmed launched invasions of Albania in 1466 and 1467 to finally eliminate Skanderbeg’s revolt. He built the fortress of Elbasan deep in Albania to secure Ottoman control. Yet Skanderbeg’s guerrilla tactics and support from Italy frustrated Mehmed until Skanderbeg’s death in 1468 effectively dissolved the organised Albanian resistance. Afterwards, the remaining Albanian strongholds gradually fell; by 1478, the tough citadel of Krujë had been starved into surrender, and the last Venetian-held city in Albania, Shkodra, only succumbed after an epic siege (and was ultimately handed over by treaty).
By the late 1470s, both sides were exhausted. Venice had suffered financially crippling losses – its trade had been disrupted, and attempts to mobilise Europe’s monarchs into a grand crusade had failed. Mehmed II, while victorious in many battles, found the Venetian navy to be a persistent nuisance and the costs of war draining even for the wealthy Ottoman treasury. In 1479, after protracted negotiations, the Ottomans and Venice agreed to the Treaty of Constantinople (1479). The peace terms reflected Ottoman dominance: Venice ceded key territories, including Shkodra and other forts in the Balkans, yielded the island of Negroponte and several Aegean islands to Mehmed, and agreed to pay a hefty war indemnity plus an annual tribute of 10,000 ducats for the privilege of trading freely in the Black Sea. The proud Venetian Republic had to bow, at least temporarily, to the reality of Ottoman power.
By the end of this war, Mehmed II had effectively secured the Balkans as the Ottoman Empire’s backyard. The Republic of Venice still held a scattering of island bases and coastal outposts, but it was clear that the Ottomans were now the pre-eminent power in the Eastern Mediterranean. Only the distant Latin stronghold of Rhodes, held by the Knights of St. John, and the Hungarian frontier remained as major checks to total Ottoman hegemony in Southeast Europe – and Mehmed had plans for those as well.
EASTERN CAMPAIGNS AND INNOVATIONS
While Mehmed’s armies were stamping the Ottoman seal on the Balkans and Greece, the sultan was equally active in extending his power eastward and consolidating the fractious Anatolian heartland of his empire. This era saw Mehmed II engage in complex struggles against other Turkic powers, employ advanced military technology, and assert centralised control over Anatolia as no Ottoman sultan had done before.
Uniting Anatolia: The Karamanids and Beyond
The interior of Anatolia (Asia Minor) was still home to a patchwork of Turkish beyliks (principalities) that had emerged after the fall of the Seljuk Sultanate centuries earlier. Among these, the most prominent was the Karamanid principality, centred around Konya and Karaman. The Karamanids were proud rivals of the Ottomans and often aligned with other enemies of Mehmed to check Ottoman expansion. Early in his reign, Mehmed II moved methodically to break their power.
In 1464, the ageing Karamanid ruler İbrahim Bey died, leaving his sons fighting over the throne. Mehmed saw an opening. One claimant, Pir Ahmet, appealed to the Ottomans for support against his brother. Mehmed agreed, dispatching Ottoman forces to back Pir Ahmet in return for the cession of some Karamanid territory. With Ottoman aid, Pir Ahmet took control of Konya and the Karamanid lands, while Mehmed annexed key border areas as “payment.” But soon Pir Ahmet regretted the bargain and rebelled, attempting to reclaim the ceded lands when Mehmed was occupied in Europe.
Mehmed II responded decisively. In 1466, the sultan led a campaign that captured the Karamanid capital of Karaman (Larende) and Konya outright. Pir Ahmet fled, and the illustrious Karamanid beylik was effectively extinguished. Over the next few years, Mehmed’s generals, like the energetic Gedik Ahmed Pasha, secured the remaining Karamanid fortresses and coastal regions. By the late 1460s, the Ottoman banner waved over the breadth of Anatolia from the Aegean to the Euphrates. Mehmed had achieved what his great-grandfather, Bayezid I, had briefly done before the disastrous invasion of Timur: the unification of Anatolia under Ottoman rule. Formerly independent Turkoman lords were either subdued or co-opted into Mehmed’s administration. This unification meant that Mehmed II now commanded vastly more resources – in manpower, agriculture, and taxes—and faced fewer internal threats.
Clash with the Akkoyunlu Confederation
Even as Anatolia was being united, a powerful external rival loomed beyond the eastern frontier: the Akkoyunlu (White Sheep Turkomans), led by the ambitious sultan Uzun Hasan. The Akkoyunlu realm, based in Persia and Mesopotamia, had grown in strength and often provided refuge or support to Mehmed’s enemies (like the Karamanid princes). Uzun Hasan cultivated alliances with Christian powers—including Venice and the defeated Empire of Trebizond—in hopes of forming a grand coalition against the Ottomans from the east and west.
Mehmed II realized that a confrontation with Uzun Hasan was inevitable. In 1473, tensions erupted into open war. Uzun Hasan’s Turkomans invaded eastern Anatolia to encourage rebellion among the recently subjugated Anatolian beys. Mehmed marched east with a large, disciplined army and his trump card: field artillery and firearms, which the Turkomans largely lacked. The decisive encounter came at the Battle of Otlukbeli in August 1473 in eastern Anatolia. Mehmed II’s forces, using their superior firepower and the tactical experience honed in Europe, won a crushing victory over Uzun Hasan’s cavalry. The White Sheep Turkomans were routed; their bow-wielding horsemen proved no match for Ottoman cannon and Janissary musket fire. This battle showcased Mehmed’s military innovativeness—he effectively combined traditional cavalry tactics with new gunpowder weapons, a hallmark of what some historians call the “military revolution” of the 15th century.
Uzun Hasan retreated, and although the Akkoyunlu state survived in a weakened form, it ceased to pose a serious threat to the Ottomans. By vanquishing this eastern rival, Mehmed secured his Anatolian conquests. In the aftermath, he extended Ottoman influence farther into eastern Anatolia and even into Crimea and the Caucasus via diplomacy and vassal treaties.
The Ottomans Gain Crimea
The 1470s also saw the Ottoman Empire extend its reach to the north, into the strategic Crimean Peninsula on the Black Sea. The Crimean Khanate was a Turkic-Mongol successor state of the Golden Horde, ruled by the Giray dynasty. It sat at the crossroads of Black Sea trade and had been an important source of slaves and goods for Genoese traders for centuries. By Mehmed’s time, Genoese colonies like Caffa dotted Crimea’s coast, effectively controlling regional trade. Mehmed II regarded these outposts as potential threats and economic prizes.
In 1475, he sent his admiral Gedik Ahmed Pasha with a fleet across the Black Sea to capture the Genoese ports in Crimea. The Ottomans swiftly overran Caffa, Soldaia, and other colonies. They also imprisoned the local Crimean Khan, forcing the Crimean Tatars to accept Ottoman suzerainty. Soon, a new khan, Meñli I Giray, was installed—one favourable to Ottoman interests. While the Crimean Khanate continued to be governed by the Giray dynasty, it now became a vassal and ally of the Ottoman Empire. This move greatly benefited Mehmed’s empire: it secured the Black Sea as an “Ottoman lake” (indeed, after 1475, the Black Sea was largely closed to Christian ships), provided a steady stream of slaves and steppe horses, and flanked the Grand Duchy of Moscow and Poland-Lithuania with a Muslim ally.
Under Mehmed II, the Ottoman state was transforming into a true gunpowder empire, harnessing new technology and centralizing its control. The sultan famously codified laws for his realm—the Fatih Kanunnamesi (Conqueror’s Law Codes) standardised criminal and administrative law, making Mehmed the first Ottoman sultan to systematically issue such a legal code. This earned him a reputation as a legislator, paving the way for later sultans like Suleiman “the Lawgiver.”
Mehmed was also a patron of the arts and sciences. In his new capital of Constantinople (now often called Istanbul), he welcomed scholars, artists, and architects from across the Islamic world and Europe. He had portraits painted by Italian masters (the Venetian artist Gentile Bellini famously painted Mehmed’s likeness), collected manuscripts, and commissioned magnificent buildings that still adorn Istanbul’s skyline. The Topkapı Palace, begun under Mehmed, became the nerve centre of a vibrant imperial culture.
MEHMED II'S LEGACY
Final Years and Legacy
By 1480, Sultan Mehmed II was at the height of his power. He was “Lord of Two Continents and Two Seas”—ruling lands in Europe and Asia, dominating the Black Sea and eastern Mediterranean. Not yet fifty years old, Mehmed was still formidably energetic and keen to expand further. In his final years, he turned his gaze southward and westward to new ambitions.
One long-standing goal was the island of Rhodes, where the Knights of St. John (a militant crusading order) had entrenched themselves and harassed Muslim shipping. Another target was southern Italy, where Mehmed dreamed of resurrecting Ottoman glory in the West—perhaps even capturing Rome itself, which he referred to as “the Red Apple” after Constantinople had been taken. In 1480, Mehmed launched an expedition across the Adriatic. An Ottoman invasion force landed on the heel of Italy and seized the city of Otranto. The news that Ottoman troops had a foothold in Italy sent a shiver through Europe. The Pope prepared defences and considered fleeing Rome. However, events took a dramatic turn.
As Mehmed mobilised for further campaigns (Rhodes, Italy, and even Egypt were speculated targets), he suddenly fell ill. In the spring of 1481, while on the march near Gebze (not far from Constantinople), the Conqueror’s health rapidly deteriorated. On May 3, 1481, Mehmed II died at the age of 49. The exact cause of his death remains unclear. Some accounts suggest he succumbed to natural illness (perhaps complications of gout or poisoning from medicine), but intriguing evidence points to foul play. It is widely believed that Mehmed may have been poisoned, possibly on the orders of his eldest son, Bayezid, who was eager to secure the throne before his ambitious father embarked on risky new wars. Regardless of the truth, Mehmed’s death brought an abrupt end to his astonishing career of conquest.
The reaction to Mehmed II’s demise was dramatic. In Europe, church bells rang out in celebration. In Venice, reportedly, people danced in the streets crying, “La Grande Aquila è morta!”—“The Great Eagle is dead!” The fearsome enemy who had loomed over Europe for decades was gone, and many hoped the Ottoman tide might ebb (though in fact it would surge on under Mehmed’s successors for some time). Within the empire, however, Mehmed’s death sparked a succession struggle between his sons Bayezid and Cem, revealing that the Conqueror’s rapid expansions had outpaced the slow, careful work of establishing a smooth succession. Ultimately, Bayezid II prevailed and took the throne, continuing much of his father’s administrative legacy if not his aggressive expansionism.
Mehmed II left behind a transformed empire and a complicated reputation. He had reigned for thirty-one years (counting his brief first stint) and expanded the Ottoman realm exponentially—adding Constantinople, all of Anatolia, and huge swaths of the Balkans. The map of Southeastern Europe and the Near East was completely redrawn by his conquests. This earned Mehmed awe and respect in the Islamic world; he is remembered as “Fatih” (the Conqueror), a heroic figure who fulfilled destiny by ending the Byzantine Empire and championing Islam’s power. He patronised scholars like the historian Kritovoulos and the poet Tursun Beg, who praised him as a wise and just ruler. Mehmed also fostered tolerance and cosmopolitanism in his imperial capital—he invited displaced Greek, Slavic, Jewish, and Turkish families to repopulate Constantinople, aiming to revive it as a flourishing centre of commerce and culture for all his subjects.
Yet in the eyes of many Christians of his time, Mehmed was seen as a dreaded tyrant—the “Turk” who had extinguished the last light of the Roman Empire and whose armies threatened Christendom. Western paintings and writings often demonized him, emphasizing episodes like the brutal sack of Constantinople or the execution of rival princes. Indeed, Mehmed could be merciless: he famously had his infant brother drowned to prevent succession disputes and did not shy from bloodshed to achieve his ends. Renaissance Europeans both feared and grudgingly respected him; a Florentine contemporary described Mehmed as “a most able and ambitious monarch, mighty in war and subtle in policy.”
In Ottoman history, Mehmed II stands as a pivotal figure—the architect of an empire. He codified laws that structured the Ottoman state for centuries, reinforcing the sultan’s autocratic authority over both military and civil matters. These laws (the Fatih’s Kanunname) were a foundation that even the illustrious Suleiman the Magnificent would build upon. Under Mehmed, the classical image of the Ottoman Sultan as an absolute, shadowy figure at the centre of a well-oiled imperial machine truly took shape.
Mehmed’s imprint on Istanbul (Constantinople) remains visible to this day. Not long after his victory, he commissioned the grand Fatih Mosque on the hill where Emperor Constantine’s tomb once stood—symbolically uniting his legacy with that of the city’s founder. Nearby is Mehmed II’s own tomb, a modest yet revered mausoleum where the Conqueror rests amid the city he so coveted. Ottoman poets and chroniclers lauded him as “the ruler of the two lands and the two seas.” In modern Turkey, he is honoured as a national hero; one of Istanbul’s massive Bosphorus bridges bears his name—the Fatih Sultan Mehmet Bridge—a fitting tribute linking Europe and Asia, just as Mehmed’s conquests did.
In sum, Sultan Mehmed II transformed the Ottoman state from a rising principality into a sprawling world empire. Brilliant, ruthless, scholarly, and bold, he embodied the complexities of his age—a medieval warrior with an eye toward Renaissance horizons. His life reads like an epic: a child sultan who lost and won a throne, a conqueror who took a city long thought unconquerable, and a statesman who balanced cultural patronage with iron rule. For history enthusiasts, Mehmed the Conqueror’s reign offers a fascinating window into the end of the Middle Ages and the dawn of a new era—one shaped in no small part by this young man from Edirne who dared to seize a legend and make it his own.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Q: Why is Mehmed II called “the Conqueror”?
A: He earned the title “the Conqueror” (Fatih) after capturing Constantinople in 1453, ending the Byzantine Empire. His subsequent campaigns brought much of the Balkans, Anatolia, and the Black Sea region under Ottoman control, securing his legacy as a formidable military leader.
Q: How did Mehmed II manage to capture Constantinople?
A: Mehmed II used innovative military tactics—most notably, deploying massive cannons to breach the city’s ancient walls and hauling ships overland to bypass harbour defences. Superior numbers, relentless siege, and engineering brilliance led to the city’s fall after a 53-day siege in 1453.
Q: What military innovations did Mehmed II use in his wars?
A: He pioneered large-scale use of gunpowder artillery, combined field tactics with firearms and cavalry, built strategic fortresses like Rumelihisarı, and modernised the Ottoman navy. His adoption of new technologies and logistics made the Ottomans a cutting-edge military power of their era.
Q: Did Mehmed II have an older brother named Ali, and did he have him killed to seize the throne?
A: Mehmed II did have an older brother, Şehzade Alaeddin Ali, who died in 1443 from a riding accident—well before Mehmed became sultan. Contrary to some modern fictional accounts, there is no credible historical evidence that Mehmed had Ali murdered. The idea that Mehmed killed his brother for the throne is a myth popularised by recent dramatisations, not by authentic Ottoman chronicles.
Q: Who was Vlad the Impaler, and what was his conflict with Mehmed II?
A: Vlad III “the Impaler” was the prince of Wallachia, famed for his brutal resistance against Ottoman control in the 1460s. After refusing to pay tribute and attacking Ottoman outposts, he faced Mehmed II’s punitive campaign. Although Vlad’s guerrilla tactics and night raids became legendary, Mehmed ultimately installed Vlad’s brother Radu as a pro-Ottoman ruler.
Q: How did Mehmed II die, and who succeeded him?
A: Mehmed II died suddenly in 1481, possibly from illness or poisoning, just as he was planning further campaigns. He was succeeded by his son, Bayezid II, after a brief succession struggle.
Q: What is Mehmed II’s legacy in the Ottoman Empire and world history?
A: Mehmed II transformed the Ottomans into a true world empire, conquering Constantinople, unifying Anatolia, and expanding into Europe. He is celebrated as a lawmaker, patron of culture, and founder of imperial Istanbul—his impact shaped centuries of Ottoman and world history.
FEATURED IMAGE
This striking portrait is “Portrait of Mehmed II” (also known as Mehmed the Conqueror), painted in 1480 by the renowned Venetian artist Gentile Bellini. Commissioned during Bellini’s visit to the Ottoman court in Istanbul, the work depicts Sultan Mehmed II in three-quarter profile, seated within a delicately rendered arch. Mehmed wears a grand white turban and a deep red robe trimmed with luxurious fur, symbolizing his imperial authority and cosmopolitan taste. The detailed, embroidered gold cloth in the foreground and the crown motifs above him reflect both his status as conqueror and his ambition to rule across East and West. The portrait’s careful realism, characteristic of Italian Renaissance painting, captures Mehmed’s determined expression and strong features, presenting him as both a powerful sultan and a cultivated Renaissance patron.
This image is historically significant not only for its artistic quality but also for what it represents: a rare meeting of Eastern and Western artistic traditions at the height of the Ottoman Empire. Bellini’s painting was commissioned after Mehmed’s conquest of Constantinople in 1453, a victory that reverberated across Europe and established the city as the new Ottoman capital. The portrait stands as a testament to Mehmed II’s desire to be recognised not only as a formidable conqueror but also as a sovereign who appreciated art, culture, and diplomacy—bridging worlds at a pivotal moment in history.
RECOMMENDED BOOKS
This website uses affiliate links. If you purchase via these links, we might earn a commission that contributes to sustaining the HistoryMedieval.com platform.
RELATED POSTS
SOURCES
Babinger, F. (1978). Mehmed the Conqueror and His Time. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Crowley, R. (2005). 1453: The Holy War for Constantinople and the Clash of Islam and the West. New York, NY: Hyperion.
Finkel, C. (2005). Osman’s Dream: The History of the Ottoman Empire. London, UK: John Murray.
Freely, J. (2009). The Grand Turk: Sultan Mehmet II – Conqueror of Constantinople, Master of an Empire. London, UK: I.B. Tauris.
Imber, C. (2002). The Ottoman Empire, 1300–1650: The Structure of Power. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
LICENSE & COPYRIGHT
The copyright holder has published this content under the following license: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike. This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon this content non-commercially, as long as they credit the author and license their new creations under the identical terms. When republishing on the web a hyperlink back to the original content source URL must be included. Please note that content linked from this page may have different licensing terms.
If I have mistakenly misused any of your content, artwork, images, or videos, please contact me on historymedieval62@gmail.com and I will take the necessary corrective action.
This website uses affiliate links. If you purchase via these links, we might earn a commission that contributes to sustaining the HistoryMedieval.com platform.
Luciano Anastasi
Luciano is the founder of the MedievalHistory platform and the LinkedIn History Enthusiasts Group, where he is dedicated to curating and sharing high-quality medieval history content. His goal is to engage scholars, teachers, students, and enthusiasts by fostering insightful discussions and promoting scholarly resources on topics from medieval warfare and religion to societal transformations and daily life in the Middle Ages.
Luciano is also an active book reviewer, focusing on academic publications related to medieval history. He recently collaborated with Yale University Press to review forthcoming medieval history titles, aiming to deepen educators' and researchers' understanding of the period. Alongside his history endeavors, he has over 40 years of experience in IT leadership roles across various industries, including the public sector, banking, insurance, airlines and consulting, and has contributed to United Nations projects.
With a Master of Arts in Business Process Management, Luciano combines his expertise in IT strategy and governance with his passion for medieval history. He leverages technology to bridge the academic community and the wider public, making historical scholarship more accessible through engaging online content.
























